Comparison of Resampling Methods on Different Remote Sensing Images for Vietnam’s Urban Classification

  • Pham Tuan Dung Center of Multidisciplinary Integrated Technology for Field Monitoring, University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi
  • Man Duc Chuc Center of Multidisciplinary Integrated Technology for Field Monitoring, University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi
  • Nguyen Thi Nhat Thanh Center of Multidisciplinary Integrated Technology for Field Monitoring, University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi
  • Bui Quang Hung Center of Multidisciplinary Integrated Technology for Field Monitoring, University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, Hanoi
  • Doan Minh Chung Space Technology Institute, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
Keywords: Urban classification, resampling, spatial resolution.


Remotely-sensed data for urban classification is very diverse in data type, acquisition time, and spatial resolution. Therefore, preprocessing is needed for input data, in which the spatial resolution must be changed by different resampling methods. However, data transformations during resampling have many effects on classification results. In this research, resampling methods were evaluated. The results showed that mean aggregation and bicubic interpolation methods performed better than the rest on a variety of data types. Besides, the highest overall accuracy and the F1 score for urban classification maps were 98.47% and 0.9842, respectively.

DOI: 10.32913/rd-ict.vol2.no15.663


The World Bank, “Vietnam Urbanization Review: Technical Assistance Report,” p. 263, 2011.

B. Yuen and A. Kumssa, Climate Change and Sustainable Urban Development in Africa and Asia, 2010.

P. T. Dung, M. D. Chuc, N. T. N. Thanh, B. Q. Hung, and D. M. Chung, “Optimizing GLCNMO version 2 method to

detect Vietnam’s urban expansion,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), 2016, pp. 309–314.

D. Drakakis-Smith and C. Dixon, “Sustainable urbanization in Vietnam,” Geoforum, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 1997.

T. T. Van, “Relationship Between Surface Temperature and Land Cover Types Using Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing, in Case of HoChiMinh City,” in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Workshop of OMISAR on the Application of Satellite Data, 2005, pp. 1–4.

T. T. An and V. A. Tuan, “Application of Remote Sensing in Land Use Change Pattern in Da Nang City, Vietnam,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences, 2008.

T. D. B. Tran, A. Puissant, D. Badariotti, and C. Weber, “Optimizing spatial resolution of imagery for urban form detection-the cases of France and Vietnam,” Remote Sensing, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2128–2147, 2011.

H. M. Pham, Y. Yamaguchi, and T. Q. Bui, “A case study on the relation between city planning and urban growth using remote sensing and spatial metrics,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2011.

N. Hoang Khanh Linh and H. Van Chuong, “Assessing the impact of urbanization on urban climate by remote satellite perspective: a case study in Danang city, Vietnam,” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-7/W3, no. May, pp. 207–212, 2015.

R. Tateishi, B. Uriyangqai, H. Al-Bilbisi, M. A. Ghar, J. Tsend-Ayush, T. Kobayashi, A. Kasimu, N. T. Hoan, A. Shalaby, B. Alsaaideh, T. Enkhzaya, Gegentana, and H. P. Sato, “Production of global land cover data - GLCNMO,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–49, 2011.

D. X. Phong, N. T. Hoan, T. Kobayashi, R. Tateishi, and L. Cover, “A GLOBAL 500-M URBAN MAP FOR GLCNMO VERSION 2,” no. Glcnmo 2003, 2012.

B. Alsaaideh, R. Tateishi, D. X. Phong, N. T. Hoan, A. AlHanbali, and B. Xiulian, “New urban map of Eurasia using MODIS and multi-source geospatial data,” Geo-spatial Information Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2017.

B. L. Markham and J. R. G. Townshend, “Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution,” in Int. Symp. Remote Sens. Environ., Ann Arbor, 1981, pp. 1075–1090.

H. Studley and K. T. Weber, “Comparison of Image Resampling Techniques for Satellite Imagery,” Final Report: Assessing Post-Fire Recovery of Sagebrush-Steppe Rangelands in Southeastern Idaho, pp. 185–196, 2011.

L. Bian and R. Butler, “Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 1999.

Z. X. Z. Xiuling, L. Z. L. Zhaoli, L. L. L. Lina, and W. H. W. Huisheng, “Evaluation of spatial aggregation methods based on satellite classification data,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (ESIAT), vol. 1, 2010, pp. 609–613.

V. Patel and P. K. Mistree, “A Review on Different Image Interpolation Techniques for Image Enhancement,” International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 129–133, 2013.

J. Titus, M. T. S. Cse, and S. Geroge, “A Comparison Study On Different Interpolation Methods Based On Satellite Images,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 82–85, 2013.

A. E. Gaughan, F. R. Stevens, C. Linard, P. Jia, and A. J. Tatem, “High Resolution Population Distribution Maps for Southeast Asia in 2010 and 2015,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e55882, feb 2013.

Y. Xie, Q. Weng, and A. Weng, “A comparative study of NPP-VIIRS and DMSP-OLS nighttime light imagery for

derivation of urban demographic metrics,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA), 2014, pp. 335–339.

J. F. Knight, R. S. Lunetta, J. Ediriwickrema, and S. Khorram, “Regional Scale Land Cover Characterization Using MODIS-NDVI 250 m Multi-Temporal Imagery: A Phenology-Based Approach,” GIScience & Remote Sensing,

vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2007.

C. D. Elvidge, B. T. Tuttle, P. S. C. Sutton, K. E. Baugh, A. T. Howard, C. Milesi, B. L. Bhaduri, and R. Nemani, “Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces,” Sensors, vol. 7, pp. 1962–1979, 2007.

M. Carroll, J. Townshend, C. DiMiceli, P. Noojipady, and R. Sohlberg, “A new global raster water mask at 250-m resolution,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 291–308, 2009.

D. Li, J. Shan, and J. Gong, Geospatial Technology for Earth Observation Data (Google eBook), 2009, vol. 2009.

R. Raj, N. a.S. Hamm, and Y. Kant, “Analysing the effect of different aggregation approaches on remotely sensed data,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 4900–4916, 2013.

D. Poobathy and R. M. Chezian, “Edge Detection Operators: Peak Signal to Noise Ratio Based Comparison,” I.J. Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 55–61, 2014.

V. Karathanassi, P. Kolokousis, and S. Ioannidou, A comparison study on fusion methods using evaluation indicators, 2007, vol. 28, no. 10.

Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004.

Regular Articles